
Can robotic end-effector gait training lower fall risk after stroke? A clinical study using the THERA-Trainer lyra shows significant gains in balance, walking ability, and patient confidence—laying the groundwork for safer, more independent recovery.

Methodology: As part of a randomised, controlled study, 16 patients were recruited from a rehabilitation facility and allocated to an intervention and control group at random. Both groups received six therapy applications, each lasting thirty minutes, over a three-week intervention period. The intervention group conducted end-effector gait training and the control group conventional gait training. Pre-testing and post-testing were carried out to investigate the risk of falling. The Timed Up and Go, Berg Balance Scale and Short Falls Efficacy Scale International were the assessments used.
Results: Improvements were able to be recorded for all assessments in both groups, with the improvements in the intervention group each higher than those of the control group. The results of the Timed Up and Go improved by an average of 29.2% in the intervention group. In the Berg Balance Scale, an improvement of 21.1% of average values in the intervention group was achieved and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International showed a percentage-based improvement of 19.8% for patients. For the intervention group, significant results were obtained in the intragroup comparison for the Timed Up and Go (p = .045), the BBS (p = .003) and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (p = .008) and in the intergroup comparison for the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (p = .047).
Conclusion: The results of the investigation show that a statistically significant improvement could be demonstrated through end-effector gait training in patients after a stroke using the TUG, BBS and Short FES-I. A positive correlation of the end-effector gait training on the risk of falling can be assumed due to stronger improvements in the intervention group compared to the control group, despite incomplete, significantly statistical results. Greater improvements in the intervention group over the control group could be attributed to the much higher number of step repetitions that the patients in the intervention group could achieve.

More concrete statements on this issue require further research, including a larger sample and follow-up investigation.The psychosocial consequences of a fall mainly include a fear of further falls. This affects one-third of older people who fall. Aside from the consequences of a fall, this developing fear of falling also poses a risk factor for another fall, which can lead to restrictions in participation and activity, waning confidence in their own abilities and loneliness in the person affected.




Related contents
Find related exciting contents in our media library.
Meet our specialists.
Are you interested in our solutions? Schedule a meeting with a Consultant to talk through your strategy and understand how TEHRA-Trainer can help you to advance rehabilitation.
You need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Turnstile. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information